Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jennifer Lowder v. Marshall County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LOWDER as Administrator, of the ESTATE OF TIFFANY HELBLING and Jennifer Lowder
Defendant:
MARSHALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AKA MATT HASSEL, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC,, SAMANTHA HAOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kunkle v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2021cv00755
Plaintiff:
Micah R Kunkle
Defendant:
Andrew Holcomb, Tami Napier, Matt Hassell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hassel et al
as 3:2020cv00852
Defendant:
Mary Loftus, Matt Hassel and Dr Tchaptchet
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Hassel et al
as 3:2020cv00738
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Rodgers and James L Rodgers
Defendant:
Matt Hassel and Beau Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hassell et al
as 3:2020cv00546
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Campbell
Defendant:
Tchaptchet, Beau Holcomb and Matt Hassell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kozikowski v. Hassel et al
as 3:2020cv00539
Plaintiff:
Stephan Thaddeus Kozikowski
Defendant:
B Holcomb, Matt Hassel and Tchaptchet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milliken v. Hassel et al
as 3:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Bo Holcomb, Quality Correctional Care and Matt Hassel
Plaintiff:
Joseph Milliken, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kratzchmar v. Marshall County Sheriff Dep et al
as 3:2020cv00360
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Kratzchmar
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff Dep, Matt Hassel, Bo Holcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler-Umanos v. Hassel
as 3:2020cv00018
Defendant:
Matt Hassel
Plaintiff:
Layden Nathaniel Butler-Umanos and Laydon Nathaniel Butler-Umanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glassman v. Hassell et al
as 3:2019cv01160
Defendant:
Matthew Hassell, Mary Loftus, Dr. Tchapchet and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Glassman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
