Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ronald Hood #235278 v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD KING HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Warden, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, RICHARD STAPLETON, Hearings Administrator and others
James Street v. MI, et al
as 11-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. STREET
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT SIZER, Health Care Department, sued in his individual and official capacity
Hood #235278 v. Woods et al
as 2:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ronald King Hood #235278
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Nick Ludwick, Richard Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Flick v. Seetha Vadlamudi, et al
as 10-2356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID P. FLICK
Defendant - Appellee:
SEETHA VADLAMUDI, VALORIE HAMMOND, SCOTT L. HOLMES and others
Defendant:
BENJAMIN C. SCARFF
Gibbs v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv13155
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gibbs
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Debra Scutt, Penny L Filion and others
Flick #285711 v. Vadlamudi et al
as 1:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
David P. Flick #285711
Defendant:
Seetha Vadlamudi, Benjamin Scarff, Valorie Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flick v. Vadlamudi et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2009cv12037
Plaintiff:
David Flick
Defendant:
Seetha Vadlamudi, Benjamin Scarff, Valorie Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Flowers v. Metrish et al
as 2:2008cv10607
Plaintiff:
Joseph Flowers
Defendant:
Linda M Metrish, Matt Sizer, William Kaupp and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Anderson #216034 v. Scarff et al
as 2:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
Darnell Anderson #216034
Defendant:
Benjamin Scarff, David Benjamin, Matt Sizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Street #190343 v.Sizer
as 2:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
James H. Street #190343
Defendant:
Matt Sizer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
