Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KERRY CONSTATINE, BEATRICE BELL, CARINNE D. KARLICK and others
Appellant:
DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Estate of Joseph Biegert v. Thomas Molitor, et al
as 19-2837
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1-10, Police Officers, BRIAN KRUEGER, Officer, THOMAS MOLITOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH BIEGERT, by Special Administrator TONI BIEGERT
Dunn v. Lumber Liquidators Inc. et al
as MN/0:15-cv-02553
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dunn
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC , Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
Dunn v. Bonneville Billing and Collections, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00866
Defendant:
Bonneville Billing and Collections, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dunn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dunn v. Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP
as 3:2011cv00346
Counter Defendant:
Matthew Dunn
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dunn
Counter Claimant:
Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP
Defendant:
Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
