Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Grant v. KAOE Transport, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
KAOE Transport, LLC and Darryl Fitzgerald White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leachman v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv04329
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Leachman
Defendant:
David Gutierrez and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
South East Carriers, Inc. v. Brooke
as 6:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
South East Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew James Brooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dieterle v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Dieterle, as Trustee of the John L. Dieterle Trust No. 1 and Matthew James Dieterle
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Leachman v. Gonzalez
as 4:2019cv02943
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Sherriff Ed Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Matthew James Leachman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leachman v. Davis
as 4:2018cv00544
Petitioner:
Matthew James Leachman
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leachman v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00457
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Leachman
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Ed Gonzales, Marcus Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leachman v. Davis
as 4:2016cv03202
Petitioner:
Matthew James Leachman
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordey v. McSpadden et al
as 5:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
James David Gordey
Defendant:
Matthew James McSpadden and Sydney Capital, LLC d/b/a Sydney Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Taylor & Hill, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Matthew James
Defendant:
Taylor & Hill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
