Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Matthew Penning v. Liberty Legal Group Inc.
as 2:2024mc00055
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
Liberty Legal Group Inc.
Penning v. Global Processing Services, LLC, et al.,
as 3:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
Global Processing Services, LLC, et al.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Penning v. LLS and Associates LLC, et al
as 1:2023mi00028
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
LLS and Associates LLC, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Penning v. Global Processing Services, LLC et al
as 3:2023mc00008
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
Global Processing Services, LLC, Premier Recovery Solutions, LLC, Premier Debt Portfolios, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Penning v. Intrinsic Tel LLC et al
as 1:2019mi00061
Defendant:
Kerry Reddick, Envision Investments LLC, Earnest Earvin, III and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Penning v. Urban, Keidenreich, Melendez, and Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00023
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
Urban, Keidenreich, Melendez, and Associates, LLC, Jason D. Urban, Robert P. Heidenreich and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
