Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
All Ingredients Plus Inc. v. Pro Star Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03250
Plaintiff:
All Ingredients Plus Inc.
Defendant:
Pro Star Logistics, Inc. , Ken Gibson, Matthew Williams and others
Cross_claimant:
Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ken Gibson, Pro Star Logistics, Inc. and Matthew Williams
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Williams v. Lemon
as 1:2015cv06116
Petitioner:
Matthew Williams
Respondent:
Charlton Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Rivera et al
as 1:2014cv08771
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
Alvin Rivera, Stephanie Kaplan and Robert Stolz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fait et al v. Barclays Bank PLC et al
as 1:2009cv03949
Plaintiff:
Alfred Fait, Alfred Fait, Alfred Fait and others
Defendant:
Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays PLC, John Silvester Varley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lefcourt v. Barclays Bank PLC et al
as 1:2009cv02668
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lefcourt
Defendant:
Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays PLC, Matthew William Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re: Barclays Bank Plc Securities Litigation
as 1:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
Marshall Freidus, Marshall Freidus, Marshall Freidus and others
Defendant:
Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays PLC, Matthew William Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Williams v. Stapainian et al
as 1:2008cv04724
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
R. Stapainian, Ms. DiBenedetto and Christine A. Sproat
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2007cv05848
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
