Cases 1 - 10 of 71
WITCHARD v. SURAMPUDI et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Defendant:
VIJAYA S. SURAMPUDI, MATTHEW H. SOLOMSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Matthews v. BOP, et al
as 23-5304
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin Matthews
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and others
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI and LALA MAHA MOQADDEM (REGRAGUI)
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, SHERRI BLUEBOND, PATRICIA GUERRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLUSS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IRVIN et al v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2021cv02080
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN and BLUE HOLLOW INCORPORATON
Defendant:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL, COURTNEY HOYT, KEN MASCARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVIN SR. v. MASCORA
as 1:2021cv02083
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN SR.
Defendant:
KEN MASCORA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRAVY v. AMARILLO, TEXAS et al
as 1:2020cv03515
Defendant:
POTTER COUNTY, SUSAN MARTINEZ, TEXAS and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MATTHEW CRAVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHERPA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02443
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, MATTHEW ALBENCE, CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
DAWA SHERPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESPEJO-DAVILA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02442
Defendant:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, CHAD WOLF, DIANNE WITTE and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN CARLO ESPEJO-DAVILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
