Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seal v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seal
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. Barmettler et al
as 1:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Erickson
Defendant:
Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dixon
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer Jeff Cantin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silverstein v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Melanie Silverstein
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer Jeff Cantin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Moultrie v. FYR SFR Borrower LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
Latoya Shanah Moultrie
Defendant:
FYR SFR Borrower LLC, Progress Residential LLC, The Totten Firm LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant:
TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reganos v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Ryan Reganos
Defendant:
Frances Watson, Robert Worle and Matthew Cristy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
