Cases 41 - 50 of 3,852
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Day et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02675
Plaintiff:
Frank Day, Min Soon Day and Matthew Day
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stokes et al v. Slayton et al
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Shane T. Stokes, Sr. and Susan C. Johnson
Defendant:
James Slayton, Roger Anthony, Matthew Androsko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Raven Production Management Group, LLC v. Phantom Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02670
Plaintiff:
Raven Production Management Group, LLC
Defendant:
Phantom Labs, Inc., MATTHEW LUPTON and Sean P. Diddy Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Perez v. Osborn et al
as 9:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Michael Osborn, Lee Harrigan, Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butt v. Amazon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
William Butt
Defendant:
Amazon, Inc., Nurse Assist, LLC and Matthew G. Rivard, D.D.S., P.A. d/b/a Smiles by Design 816
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
