Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lahood v. Oprihory et al
as 3:2022cv04406
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LAHOOD
Defendant:
FRANCENE OPRIHORY, Amen Atelek, Elizabeth Broderick-Oprihory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lahood v. Oprihory et al
as 2:2022cv04406
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LAHOOD
Defendant:
FRANCENE OPRIHORY, Amen Atelek, Elizabeth Broderick-Oprihory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lahood v. Oprihory et al
as 1:2022cv05236
Plaintiff:
George Lahood
Defendant:
Francene Oprihory, Amen Atelek, Elizabeth Broderick-Oprihory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lavender v. UIC College of Denistry et al
as 1:2016cv01996
Plaintiff:
Doris Queen Lavender
Defendant:
UIC College of Denistry, D. Robinson, Johnnie May Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doris Queen Lavender v. UIC College of Dentistry, et al
as 15-3659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Doris Queen Lavender, also known as Doris Ann Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
UIC College of Dentistry, Magdaline Argirova, Dentist, Bryan Bauer, Dentist and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
