Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Khan v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv02168
Plaintiff:
Raffique N. Khan
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor of NYC Eric L. Adams, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ellison v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Shamuel Ellison
Defendant:
Mayor of NYC Eric Adams, NYPD Commissioner Keechant Sewell, NYPD Member Does #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. New York City Midtown West Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Johnny Diaz
Defendant:
New York City Midtown West Police Department, NYPD Sgt John Doe, NYPD Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. NYPD (New York Police Departme
as 17-659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sean A. Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
Mayor John Doe, or Jane Doe and New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
Defendant:
NYPD New York Police Department, Commissioner, Mayor Bill de Blasio, Mayor of NYC and John Doe, or Jane Doe
Armour v. NYC Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Jerome Armour
Defendant:
NYC Police Department, Consumer Affairs of NYC, Bid-Lincoln Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. NYC Docs and Commands et al
as 1:2012cv06138
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gamez
Defendant:
NYC Docs and Commands, Singleton, The State of NY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Louis v. Governor of NY et al
as 1:2012cv01976
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Defendant:
Governor of NY, Mayor of NYC, Indiana Point Nuclear Reactor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Strunk v. Department of Commerce, et al
as 10-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk, also known as Chris
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce, City of New York, (NYC) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
