Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
MCADAMS v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv04027
Plaintiff: ANTHONY J. MCADAMS
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
HINKES v. MCADAM et al
as 2:2013cv01745
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH AND DAVID HINKES
Defendant: LOWELL C. MCADAM , VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. , URSULA BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01617
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCADAM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59498
Plaintiff: DONALD H. MCADAM
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCADAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2011cv00222
Plaintiff: ANTHONY A. MCADAMS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCADAMS v. LONGLEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00284
Petitioner: WILLIAM F. MCADAMS
Respondent: ARCHIE B. LONGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCADAMS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71808
Plaintiff: OSCAR E. MCADAMS
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCADAM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30746
Plaintiff: DONALD H. MCADAM
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. H. BULL AND CO., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
HUNTER et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv06123
Plaintiff: ETTA MAE HUNTER, ROGER PARKS, JERRY ROBINSON and others
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCADAM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv30455
Plaintiff: DONALD G. MCADAM
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?