Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Emory Batten
Defendant:
Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McKillip, Esq. et al
as 1:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Daryl Williams
Defendant:
Douglas C. McKillip, Esq., McKillip Law Firm, LLC, Merbaum & Becker, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harpo-Brown v. Craig et al
as 1:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Shawn E. Lagrua, J. Randal Hall, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temple v. Temple et al
as 1:2019cv03867
Defendant:
Waterton Associates, L.L.C., Brenda C. Temple, Waterton Residential, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Tandra G. Temple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo-Brown v. Fulton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv03848
Defendant:
Robert McBurney, McMickle, Kurey & Branch, LLP, Che Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo-Brown v. Fulton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv01399
Defendant:
Deedra Nelson, Robert McBurney, Fulton County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo v. Fulton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2018cv01824
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Fulton County Superior Court and Robert McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Diggs v. McBurney et al
as 1:2018cv01349
Plaintiff:
Gary Diggs
Defendant:
Robert McBurney and Gail Tusan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. McBurney
as 1:2018cv00571
Plaintiff:
Gary Diggs
Defendant:
Robert McBurney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
