Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Lourdes Toman et al v. Jerry Glomboske et al
as 8:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Herrera, Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Toman, Antonio Paredes and Alan Castro
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucero et al v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Estevan R. Lucero, Mahlia Elyse Lucero, Heidi Doyle and others
Defendant:
City of San Diego, County of San Diego, San Diego Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
McCaskill v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv03539
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCaskill
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) McCaskill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01069
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin Laine McCaskill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCaskill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018at00574
Plaintiff:
Kevin Laine McCaskill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Latasha McCaskill v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2014cv01770
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
LaTasha McCaskill
Hairston et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv05791
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hairston , Mary Beth Harrelson , David Harrelson and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal McCaskill v. Ralph M. Diaz
as 2:2013cv07225
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz
Petitioner:
Neal McCaskill
McMasters-Stone et al v. Biden
as 2:2012cv02711
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. McMasters-Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Daniel Akaka, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
