Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. et al v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. and Terence J. Sweeney
Defendant:
Richard Neville, Walker H. Bramlett, Pamela D. Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daugherty v. State Court of Forsyth County et al
as 1:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Leslie Daugherty
Defendant:
State Court of Forsyth County and T. Russell McClelland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LASTER et al v. BARNES et al
as 1:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
LINDA LASTER and JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant:
RUSS F BARNES, GERALD E MOORE, JOHN M DUFFOO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClelland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01767
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Larry McClelland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweeney v. Woodward et al
as 2:2019cv00125
Respondent:
Officer S. Bowman, Stephanie Woodward, Mollie M. Anderson and others
Petitioner:
Terence Joseph Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rahrer v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Moore, M. R. Hobbs, Foster and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Rahrer, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Agnes-Sampson v. Arris International PLC et al
as 1:2019cv00243
Defendant:
James A. Chiddix, Debora J. Wilson, Bruce McClelland and others
Plaintiff:
Louise Agnes-Sampson
Uzun v. Arris International PLC et al
as 1:2018cv05555
Defendant:
James A. Chiddix, Andrew M. Barron, Debora J. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Uzun
Rahrer v. Deal et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
Leslie Abernathy-Maddox, Janet Bagely, Russel Troy McClelland and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Rahrer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
