Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ruthie McClinton v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09547
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
Ruthie McClinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) McClinton v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Andre Kaefunn McClinton
Defendant:
Robert Andre, Howard E. Mosely, T. Thor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08750
Plaintiff:
Michika McClinton
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kari Aanenson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05047
Plaintiff:
Lori Stolle, Kari Aanenson, Michael Abel and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
C. Finley et al. v. Eric Michael Garcetti et al
as 2:2022cv03528
Plaintiff:
C. FINLEY
Defendant:
ERIC MICHAEL GARCETTI, GILBERT CEDILLO, PAUL KREKORIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramona Gibson et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01068
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Dupree, Jennifer W. Edwards, Georgette Enwright and others
Sean McClinton v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01234
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Sean McClinton
Brian Robert McClinton v. State of California
as 2:2016cv06676
Petitioner:
Brian Robert McClinton
Respondent:
State of California
Brian Robert McClinton v. State of California
as 2:2016cv06686
Petitioner:
Brian Robert McClinton
Respondent:
State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
