Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MCCOLGAN v. APPLE VACATIONS AND AMR RESORTS et al
as 2:2022cv04182
Plaintiff:
JOANNA MCCOLGAN
Defendant:
APPLE VACATIONS AND AMR RESORTS and HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ISENBERG et al v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05673
Plaintiff:
MARC ISENBERG, JASON DELLISANTI, CARMEL MCCOLGAN and others
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sargent et al v. School District of Philadelphia et al
as 2:2022cv01509
Plaintiff:
Sherice Sargent, Fallon Girini, Michele Sheridan and others
Defendant:
School District of Philadelphia, William R. Hite, Board of Education, the School District of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALL v. EGG HARBOR CITY et al
as 1:2015cv07886
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMALL
Defendant:
EGG HARBOR CITY , JEFFREY TAKOTEY , MATTHEW LANDICINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAUMAN v. MCCOLGAN et al
as 2:2012cv01238
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BAUMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS MCCOLGAN , BULL TRUCK LINE LP , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE ARROYO et al v. CITY OF EGG HARBOR et al
as 1:2010cv05831
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE ARROYO , ISABEL ARROYO , GILBERTO ARROYO, SR. and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EGG HARBOR , EGG HARBOR CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , EGG HARBOR CITY POLICE CHIEF, JOHN MCCOLGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL et al v. APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv02915
Plaintiff:
GILBERT MITCHELL, CHRISTOPHER ALBERTSON, MARK ANKNER and others
Defendant:
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P. and NHP MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
