Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hanekom et al v. MANAGED CARE OF NORTH AMERICA INC.,
as 0:2023cv61151
Plaintiff:
Yvon Hanekom and Kade McCraw
Defendant:
MANAGED CARE OF NORTH AMERICA INC., d/b/a MCNA DENTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crowe v. Managed Care of North America, Inc.
as 0:2023cv61065
Plaintiff:
Donna Crowe
Defendant:
Managed Care of North America, Inc. doing business as MCNA Dental
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRANDY NELSON, Brittney Brown, Dennis Shuey and others
Consolidated Defendant:
MCNA Insurance Co. and MCNA Health Care Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MCCRAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62503
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MCCRAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRAW v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCRAW
Defendant:
Lt VIRGINIA WILLIAMS and Head Nurse ROBYN BARROWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15190
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MCCRAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRAW v. BARROW
as 7:2020cv00163
Defendant:
ROBYN BARROW
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCRAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50312
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAN MCCRAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRAW v. BARROWS
as 7:2019cv00058
Defendant:
JANE DOE and ROBYN BARROWS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCRAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAW v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 7:2019cv00059
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MCCRAW
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
