Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Johnson v. Houghteling et al
as 1:2020cv07472
Defendant:
Gerald E. Kubasiak, Lindsay A. Valcho, Tchedy Y. Desire and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDade v. Mac's Convenience Stores LLC
as 3:2020cv03303
Defendant:
Mac's Convenience Stores, LLC doing business as Circle K
Plaintiff:
Betty McDade
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Mac's Convenience Stores, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe I et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago
as 1:2020cv06486
Defendant:
The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, John Thuet, District 14 of CPS Schools and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, II and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardy et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2019cv04436
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Astrazeneca LP and others
Plaintiff:
Betty McDade and D.C. Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yameen v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01789
Plaintiff:
Khalil Yameen
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Williams, Crema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
McDade v. South Holland Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv06562
Plaintiff:
George McDade
Defendant:
South Holland Police Dept., Officer Leyden and States Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
