Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv01353
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. The Transgender Committee et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer McDermott, Cynthia Radtke, TCI's Multi-Disciplinary Team and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Rose Campbell and Ms. Campbell, mark a.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Foreman et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
Dr Garcis, Division of Hearings and Appeals Commissioners, Jennifer Arndt and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Edith Mae May
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. McDermott et al
as 2:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Jorge Martinez
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, John Noble, Thomas Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. McDermott et al
as 2:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Shun Warren
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, John Noble, Thomas Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earl v. McDermott et al
as 2:2023cv01017
Plaintiff:
Daryise L Earl
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott and John/Jane Does 1-80
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. McDermott
as 1:2023cv00971
Petitioner:
Donna Rae Matthews
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
