Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kuerbitz v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2024cv10774
Plaintiff:
Arnold Kuerbitz
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Karen McDonald and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
SJ, et al v. Pontiac, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10111
Plaintiff:
SJ and SE, Lawrence F Jasper, II, Rosalia O Jasper and others
Defendant:
Pontiac, City of, Pontiac Housing Commission, Mungo & Mungo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Riverview, City of et al
as 5:2023cv12531
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Gail Lewis
Defendant:
Riverview, City of, Matthew Lyles and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11975
Plaintiff:
Heather McDonald
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tucker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv11955
Plaintiff:
Brandon Tucker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Troy, City of, Sheldon G Larky and others
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Walker v. Walker et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Wayne Walker
Defendant:
William Walker, Jeff Sorensen, Jack Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sims v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Montoyya Sims
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Petition for Removal - Tort Claims Procedure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
