Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 79
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff: SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant: AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLANTINE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, LISA WOLFE, KIM HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. BALLENGER et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant: J. D. BALLENGER, DENNIS REAGLE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff: G. BUCHANAN
Defendant: A. ALSIP, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, C. COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. PATTON
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff: MICHAEL L MCDONALD
Defendant: SHERRIE PATTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00339
Petitioner: TRASHAWN MICHAEL MCDONALD
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01010
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
4Th Party Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff: ASHER B. HILL
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, THOMAS WELLINGTON, T. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard et al v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00300
Plaintiff: Corbyn Howard and R.H.
Defendant: Kelly Fisher, Don Garab and Chad McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff: MARK THOMAS DAWSON
Defendant: CHLOE WARGNY, LAURA A. BODKIN, MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?