Cases 11 - 18 of 18
McDonald v. USA
as 1:2017cv00329
Petitioner:
Matthew McDonald
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McDonald et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00360
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dana McDonald and Richard McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley-McDonald v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mary Stanley-McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDonald v. USA
as 1:2014cv00255
Petitioner:
Matthew McDonald
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Escobar v. NH State Prison, Warden et al
as 1:2012fp00167
Defendant:
Brad Bowden, Santo Fiorillo, FNU Greenwood and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Escobar, III
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connecticut River Bank, N.A. v. McDonald et al
as 1:2007cv00410
Plaintiff:
Connecticut River Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Daniel J. McDonald, Anne M. McDonald and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Katz et al v. NH Department of Health and Human Services, Division for Children, Youth and Families et al
as 1:2007cv00383
Plaintiff:
Elena Katz and John/Jane Does
Defendant:
NH Department of Health and Human Services, Division for Children, Youth and Families, Brian M. McVeign, Brian Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook et al v. City of Concord
as 1:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian H. Cook, Michael W. Kulak, Steven L. Martel and others
Defendant:
Concord, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
