Cases 1 - 10 of 84
McDonald v. Lilly et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Alexis McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Lilly, Garfield County Detention Center and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deweese v. McDonald
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
George Deweese
Defendant:
Ralph McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Lynn McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
McDonald v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Crystal McDonald
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooper v. Hogue et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Demetric Lemond Hooper
Defendant:
Tiana Lorissa Robinson-Hogue, Oklahoma City Police Department, BioLife Plasma Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald 7 LLC et al v. Ovintiv Inc
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
McDonald 7 LLC and Stapleton Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Ovintiv Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RX Medical LLC et al v. Melton et al
as 5:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
RX Medical LLC, ROK Sales LLC and ROK Medical Managment LLC
Defendant:
Rob Melton, Justin Poos, Brady Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
