Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
McDonald v. Donahue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01207
Petitioner: Isaac McDonald
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01237
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
McDonald et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02511
Plaintiff: Michael McDonald and Quinton Lytle
Defendant: City Of Memphis, Tennessee, Marico Flake and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingram v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02898
Plaintiff: Ronnie Lee Ingram
Defendant: The State of Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Bey v. Moore et al
as 2:2011cv02230
Plaintiff: :Ptah-Ra-Amun-Ankh: El Bey
Defendant: Robert Moore, H. Williams, C. Wages and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02155
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hale v. NWCX et al
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff: Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant: NWCX, Tony Parker, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02779
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Baker et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02396
Plaintiff: Susan Baker and Terrell Baker
Defendant: McDonald's USA, LLC, BP Products North America, Inc., Willoughby, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Castillo
as 2:2009cv02471
Petitioner: Curtis Lee McDonald
Respondent: Juan Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?