Cases 1 - 10 of 74
MCDONOUGH v. ALGORITHM, INC.
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R McDonough
Defendant:
Algorithm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
THOMPKINS et al v. MCKEESPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY THOMPKINS, EZRA DIXON and KIM NEAL
Defendant:
CITY OF MCKEESPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MCKEESPORT, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
McDonough et al v. Tecnodue Srl et al
as 2:2023cv04568
Plaintiff:
Edward McDonough and Shannon McDonough
Defendant:
Tecnodue Srl, I.T.S. Ital Trade Services Srl and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUELL v. MCDONOUGH
as 2:2023cv03513
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN RUELL
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AMOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 2:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
MARCI JONES AMOS
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, MICHAEL MANGIONE, MARY HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
