Cases 1 - 10 of 52
McGuire v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McGuire
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MCGUIRE v. ASCENSION HEALTH MINISTRY SERVICE CENTER, LLC
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McGuire
Defendant:
Ascension Health Ministry Service Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE CORDELL HIGGINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McGuire v. Weldon et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Dustin E McGuire and Dustin McGuire
Defendant:
Alyssa Weldon, Richard Arnold, Donald Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGUIRE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02224
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MCGUIRE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
McGuire v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Dustin E McGuire and Dustin McGuire
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARNOLD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02769
Plaintiff:
SHEILA ARNOLD
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murgaw v. McGuire et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Rictor Leroy Murgaw, Jr
Defendant:
Chad Michael McGuire and Landlord of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murgaw v. McGuire et al
as 1:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Rictor Leroy Murgaw, Jr
Defendant:
Chad Michael McGuire and Landlord of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBY v. LUBBENHUSEN et al
as 2:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Defendant:
K. LUBBENHUSEN, . MCGUIRE, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
