Cases 51 - 60 of 131
McKay v. United States Postal Office
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Dianne Karen McKay
Defendant:
United States Postal Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKay v. State of New York
as 6:2016cv06834
Plaintiff:
Donna McKay
Defendant:
State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKay v. East Hartford Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv01954
Plaintiff:
Rasheen J. McKay
Defendant:
East Hartford Police Department , Scott M Sansom , Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv09045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. City of New York
as 1:2016cv06426
Plaintiff:
Johnson and Michael Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Daniel A. Nigro, Michael Gala and others
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. Joseph Kevin McKay
Interested Party:
Susan Edelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roe v. Chappaqua Central School District et al
as 7:2016cv07099
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
Chappaqua Central School District , Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District , John Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney v. Patrick et al
as 6:2016cv06380
Plaintiff:
Clarence Delaney, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Patrick, Jennifer Wildman, Heather McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deucalion Advisors, LLC v. McKay
as 1:2016cv02614
Plaintiff:
Deucalion Advisors, LLC
Defendant:
Steve McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epstein v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2016cv01602
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Shaun McKay, Suffolk County Community College and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Trisvan v. McKay et al
as 1:2015cv08391
Plaintiff:
John Trisvan
Defendant:
James McKay, Alice Anderson, Brian Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
