Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFadden v. Morley et al
as 6:2020cv06934
Defendant:
John Morley, MD, Scott Kelly, Haether L. McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ghaffaar McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv00644
Defendant:
Razia Ferdous, Terry Moran, Carl J. Koenigsmann and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripathy v. Kickbush et al
as 6:2019cv06850
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Tripathy
Defendant:
Sorc R. Hoffman, ORC De-Cotton, DSP Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Occhipinti v. Annucci et al
as 6:2019cv06651
Defendant:
G. Mohring, M.D. H. U. Sheikh, Osbourne McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Occhipinti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. McKay et al
as 9:2014cv00803
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff McKay , Gail Haponik , Carl Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancey v. The People of the United States et al
as 1:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
John B. Yancey, Sr.
Defendant:
The People of the United States, Eric Holder, Jorge S. DeRosas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKay v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv07708
Petitioner:
Alex T. McKay
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Otisville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCCray v. Fisher et al
as 1:2012cv03651
Plaintiff:
Cerious MCCray
Defendant:
Brian Fisher, Phillip D. Heath, Lesley Malin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKay v. NY DOCS et al
as 1:2009cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac McKay
Defendant:
NY DOCS and Lawrence
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
