Cases 1 - 10 of 95
McKinney v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
Brent McKinney
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Brenda McKinney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03358
Plaintiff:
John McKinney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peffley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03179
Plaintiff:
Joy Peffley f/k/a McKinney, Joy Peffley and McKinney
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKinney v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv02965
Plaintiff:
Samantha McKinney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Justin McKinney and Anna McKinney
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R BARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McKinney v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
William McKinney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney v. Bracy
as 4:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Terrence McKinney
Respondent:
Warden Charmaine Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv05074
Plaintiff:
Debra L. McKinney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
