Cases 1 - 10 of 35
McMahon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04875
Plaintiff:
John McMahon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 5:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON DAVIS
Defendant:
CLEVELAND, GARY SCHMANSKY, GOVERNOR CUOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05579
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McMahon v. Gupta
as 1:2017cv02755
Plaintiff:
Lora McMahon
Defendant:
Tarsem L. Gupta, M.D., P.C. and Tarsem L. Gupta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
The Bank of New York Mellon v. McMahon
as 1:2017cv00721
Defendant:
Linda McMahon
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HENDERSON v. TOMLINSON et al
as 4:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERESA TOMLINSON, JOHN DARR, GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Office Parks of Virginia, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01618
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. and Days Inns of America Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Office Parks of Virginia, Inc. and Sam H. McMahon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahon v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01610
Plaintiff:
Sharon McMahon
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahon et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 1:2015cv01219
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group
Plaintiff:
Sharon McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morning Star Associates, Inc. et al v. Unishippers Global Logistics, LLC
as 1:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Morning Star Associates, Inc. , Margaret Herrmann , Robert McMahon and others
Defendant:
Unishippers Global Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
