Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WORLDWIDE LANGUAGE RESOURCES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
WORLDWIDE LANGUAGE RESOURCES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Movant:
MCNEIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Labastida et al v. McNeil Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01690
Plaintiff:
Mariana Labastida , George Van Hemert and Abraham Cecena
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc. , Does 2 through 500, inclusive and Invizion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINC GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2010cv00375
Plaintiff:
LINC GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
MCNEIL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Jenkins v. McNeil Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00634
Plaintiff:
William Jenkins
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. McNeil Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00540
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hester v. Vision Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00021
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hester
Defendant:
Vision Airlines, Inc.
Movant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc.
Scharpenberg v. Carrington et al
as 1:2009cv01058
Plaintiff:
Henry S. Scharpenberg and Henry S. Scharpenberg
Defendant:
Robert S. Carrington, McNeil Technologies, Inc., McNeil Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Watson v. McNeil Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01209
Plaintiff:
Portland R. Watson
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc. and Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Corbett v. McNeil Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. Corbett
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc. and Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hibley v. McNeil Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00137
Plaintiff:
Starline V. Hibley
Defendant:
McNeil Technologies, Inc. and Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
