Cases 21 - 30 of 51
McNeill v. Lee's Toyota et al
as 1:2016cv02058
Defendant:
Lee's Toyota, Manager of Lee's Toyota, Eliot Salow and others
Plaintiff:
Fitzroy McNeill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Belardinelli et al v. Concepts in Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04924
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BELARDINELLI , NORMAN DYMBORT , AMY BERWALD GASPARI and others
Defendant:
CONCEPTS IN STAFFING, INC., ARTHUR ABRAMS and MONA ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Belardinelli et al v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2015cv04923
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BELARDINELLI , NORMAN DYMBORT , AMY BERWALD GASPARI and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Belardinelli et al v. Concepts in Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04935
Defendant:
Concepts in Staffing, Inc. , Arthur Abrams and Mona Abrams
Plaintiff:
Matthew Belardinelli , Norman Dymbort , Amy Berwald Gaspari and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McNeill v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Quentin D. McNeill
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McNeill v. Ruiz-Kenyon et al
as 1:2015cv00992
Plaintiff:
Stacy Angelina McNeill
Defendant:
C.J. Ruiz-Kenyon and US Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
McNeill v. Jordan et al
as 1:2014cv02872
Defendant:
Anthony Gomez, Detectives Jonathan Jordan and William J. Sommer
Plaintiff:
Fitzroy McNeill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeill v. Stewart et al
as 2:2013cv07244
Plaintiff:
Kysha R. McNeill
Defendant:
Claudia Stewart and Robert Stewart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
