Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lourdes Toman et al v. Jerry Glomboske et al
as 8:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Herrera, Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Toman, Antonio Paredes and Alan Castro
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Sony Corporation of America et al
as 4:2021cv02454
Defendant:
Sony Corporation of America and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Plaintiff:
Lmarc Turner, Rohit Burani, Christian Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McShane v. SF Markets, LLC
as 5:2020cv01135
Plaintiff:
Gina McShane
Defendant:
SF Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Charles Samuel Couch v. City of Manhattan Beach et al
as 2:2013cv07554
Defendant:
Det Michael Allard, Sgt. B Brown, City of Manhattan Beach and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Couch
Betty M Swift et al v. United States of America
as 8:2012cv00892
Plaintiff:
Henry Klein, Norma Jean Marshall Klein, Janet M Marshall and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Banks v. Lee et al
as 4:2011cv04683
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Wilson Banks
Defendant:
Anders Lee, Donald McShane, John Gayton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McShane v. Co-operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kimberly McShane
Defendant:
Co-operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Douglas Brian McShane v. Matthew Cate
as 5:2009cv01243
Petitioner:
Douglas Brian McShane
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
