Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
McDonalds Corporation v. GB One, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
McDonalds Corporation
Defendant:
GB One, LLC and GOLDEN BEAR DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Aaron v. McDonald's Corporation
as 3:2021cv01942
Plaintiff:
David Aaron
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeffreys v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00327
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and Unidentified Young Male Employee
Plaintiff:
Jessyka Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00367
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Washington
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ebaben v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
Louisa Ebaben
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McDonald's Corporation, et al v. Richard Strahm, et al
as 20-3551
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION and MCDONALD'S REAL ESTATE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD V. STRAHM
Defendant:
JAMES D. ANDERSON, CLAUDIA TITUS, MARGIE HUBER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
