Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McElroy v. Givens et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McElroy
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens and Corbin Tunstall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muhammad v. Lee County Commission of Lee County, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2022cv00713
Defendant:
Deputy McElroy, Lee County Commission of Lee County, Alabama, Deputy Kamisi and others
Plaintiff:
Lateefah Muhammad
Petitioner:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hare et al v. McElroy et al
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Yamil Hare, Jose Sosa and Yamil Alexsander Hare
Defendant:
Stacy McElroy, Sheriff Huey Mack, Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. McElroy et al
as 2:2018cv01377
Defendant:
Alameda County, Jefferson County, Alabama, Elizabeth W. McElroy and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Gregory Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McElroy v. Hueytown, City of et al
as 2:2013cv02065
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth W McElroy
Defendant:
Hueytown, City of and Tracey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
