Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McElroy v. Advanced Body Sculpting of New England et al
as 1:2024cv10195
Plaintiff:
Jami McElroy
Defendant:
Advanced Body Sculpting of New England and Mark X. Lowney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
McElroy v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11293
Plaintiff:
Monita McElroy
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Natal-Lugo et al v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2020cv11979
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ruiz-Hernandez, Miguel Sanchez, Leslie Lugo and others
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Ross Aubin, Michael Silvia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe No. 101 v. McElroy
as 1:2019cv10200
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No. 101
Defendant:
Todd C. McElroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McElroy v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue et al
as 1:2018cv10748
Plaintiff:
Gregory McElroy
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Revenue and Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Tejada et al v. Mattress Firm Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12448
Plaintiff:
Mack Perez-Tejada , Roy McElroy , Ashraf Meshriky and others
Defendant:
Mattress Firm Inc. , Kenneth E Murphy and Jim Black
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McElroy et al v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus
as 1:2015cv14144
Plaintiff:
Robert McElroy and Virginia McElroy
Defendant:
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv13342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
