Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lee v. E.M.C.F. Medical Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee
Defendant:
E.M.C.F. Medical Dept., Nurse Unknown PLN. Wright, Nurse Unknown Brookshire and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Lee County Adult Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Medical Dept., Lee County Adult Jail, Jamie Burrell and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eleopoulos v. Lee Co Tupelo Adult Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Lee Co Tupelo Adult Jail and Medical Dept
Plaintiff:
Michael Clinton Eleopoulos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Meetze v. Ron King, et al.
as 3:2021cv00021
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
J. Farmer, Miller, Ron King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilmoth Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meetze v. CMCF Medical Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv00181
Defendant:
L. Sutton, Warden Miller, J. Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilmoth Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Battles v. Desoto County Jail Staff et al
as 3:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Desoto County Jail Medical Dept., Desoto County Mississippi, Desoto County Jail Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Battles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harrison v. Maintenance Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00407
Defendant:
Maintenance Dept., Medical Dept., South Mississippi Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Edward Harrison, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. E.M.C.F et al
as 3:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
Fable Nathan Adams
Defendant:
E.M.C.F, MTC, Derrick Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
Lester Lee Ellis
Defendant:
Outlaw and MTC-Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. McMillan et al
as 3:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
Cedric Ramone Williams
Defendant:
Malcolm McMillan, H.C.D.C. Medical Dept. and Unknown Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
