Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Ruff v. Griffis, et al
as 7:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, Accountant Flor DelBosque, Medical Director T.J. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Malcom Donald Ruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roppolo v. Linthicum et al
as 2:2019cv00262
Defendant:
Erin Wyrick, Ben Raimer, John Burruss and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roppolo and Da-Na Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Eastridge et al
as 7:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Joseph Eastridge and Medical Director
Plaintiff:
Antonio Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agnew v. Richardson et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
NFN Richardson, NFN Hardagree and Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Herrera et al
as 4:2018cv02940
Plaintiff:
Douglas Collins
Defendant:
Medical Director A Lindly, Deputy Director Cody Ginsel, Medical Director Avila Fausto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
von Falkenhorst v. Ouswu et al
as 3:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Rainer von Falkenhorst, III
Defendant:
Kawabena Ouswu, Mary Omah, IFI Prison Fellowship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angulo v. GEO Group et al
as 4:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ivan Viveros Angulo
Defendant:
GEO Group, Warden T. Johns and Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Krieg v. Avant et al
as 4:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
William Henry Krieg
Defendant:
Donald Ray Avant, Mark Thurston, John Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warren v. Livingston et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Travis Warren
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bryan Gordy, Garth Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Medical Director John Doe et al
as 1:2015cv00110
Defendant:
Medical Director John Doe, Administrative Director, Jester 4 Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
