Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MARTINEZ MEDINA v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
OSCAR ARMANDO MARTINEZ MEDINA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01799
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Calinski v. Maltes et al
as 2:2011mc00155
Plaintiff:
Ema Marisol Calinski
Defendant:
Martha Medina Maltes, Ruthann A Dorochoff and Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
MEDINA v. USA
as 1:2011cv01102
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MEDINA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rubio v. Sperian Eye & Face Protection Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Antonio Medina Rubio
Defendant:
Sperian Eye & Face Protection Inc , Sperian Protection Americas Inc and Sperian Protection USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY et al v. DURAN et al
as 1:2010cv00691
Defendant:
ROBERTO MEDINA DURAN, GRD TRANSPORT and AMANPREH S. MULTANI
Plaintiff:
JENNIE HENRY and TODD HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
Ernest Johnson, III
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Westville Correctional Facility, Jesse Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
