Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Jackson v. Nye County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2016cv03022
Defendant:
Nye County Sheriff's Office and Antonio M. Medina
Plaintiff:
Jackson and Kelly Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Medina v. Pitts
as 3:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
Delano Medina
Defendant:
Jim Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pathak v. Spadaro et al
as 2:2016cv02096
Defendant:
Sunil Bhasin, Anjelica Juana Hernandez, David Alan Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Bharat Pathak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zaldivar et al v. Medina et al
as 2:2016cv01165
Defendant:
Wren Bradly, Madeline Lee, Lori Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Deseray Jasmin Ramon, Diamond Amithyist Ramon and Michelle Zaldivar
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gulley v. Nye County et al
as 2:2016cv00853
Defendant:
David Boruchowitz, Anthony De Meo, Michael Eisenloffel and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Gulley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tagle v. Anderson et al
as 2:2016cv00757
Respondent:
Michael Anderson, Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Petitioner:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
