Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Raudez Mejia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Vilce Jose Raudez Mejia
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States v. Mejia-Zavala
as 24-2043
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE MEJIA-ZAVALA
Serrrano-Mejia (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02497
Petitioner:
Venustiano Serrrano-Mejia
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendoza et al v. Zomer Brothers Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Raul Gonzalez Mendoza and Mara Mejia De Gonzalez
Defendant:
Zomer Brothers Inc, Great West Casualty Co, Daniel P Finneman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Mejia v. Kirk et al
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Romero Mejia
Defendant:
Geoffrey Kirk, Pete Valencia and West Valley City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez et al v. Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
as 2:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez, Adrian Margarito Lopez-Arenas, Alfonso Navaez-Uscanga and others
Defendant:
Epic Landscape Productions, Inc., Epic Landscape Prductions and Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
United States v. Mejia
as 22-2017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JIMMY EDUARDO MEJIA
Knight v. San Juan County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Knight
Defendant:
San Juan County Adult Detention Center, D. Webb, B. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ontiveros et al v. Kate's Place, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Kate Singer Leonard and Kate's Place, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Ontiveros and Irene Mejia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
