Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Melanie Latronica v. Merrill Lynch, et al
as 17-15361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELANIE C. LATRONICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, BANK OF AMERICA, NA (USA), Business Personal Property Tax, MID MIDLAND EMPIRE TRADING CO. and others
Latronica v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv01352
Plaintiff:
Melanie C. Latronica
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Bank of America National Association Business Personal Property Tax, MID Midland Empire Trading Co and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Latronica v. USDC, Eastern District of CA - Fresno Division
as 1:2016cv01349
Petitioner:
Melanie C. Latronica
Respondent:
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California - Fresno Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latronica v. England et al
as 1:2016cv01095
Plaintiff:
Melanie C. Latronica
Defendant:
Morrison C. England, Jr. and Richard Seeborg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Latronica v. Double Tree by Hilton et al
as 4:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
Melanie C. Latronica
Defendant:
Cyprus Private Security/Scenic Properties LLC, City of Modesto, Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Latronica v. Halfhill et al
as 4:2014cv04257
Plaintiff:
Melanie C. Latronica
Defendant:
Martin O. Halfhill, Hermesh Lee Sangha, Laura Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melanie Latronica v. USA, et al
as 14-15460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELANIE C. LATRONICA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION and others
Melanie Latronica v. State of California
as 13-16048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELANIE C. LATRONICA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Latronica v. Obama et al
as 2:2012cv01592
Plaintiff:
Melanie C. Latronica
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama and Contra Costa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latronica v. State of California
as 2:2012cv01047
Plaintiff:
Melanie C. Latronica
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
