Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Myrick v. Meletis
as 1:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Justin O. Myrick
Defendant:
Peter A. Meletis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julius Hodges v. Peter Meletis
as 22-6427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS LAMART HODGES
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. PETER MELETIS, Superintendent, in their official capacity, CPT. ALLEN B. WEST, Inmate classification; in his official capacity and LT. WANDA CREIGHTON, Work Release Manager, in their official capacity
Hodges v. Meletis et al
as 3:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamart Hodges
Defendant:
Col. Pete Meletis, Cpt. Allen West and Lt. Wanda Creighton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Meletis et al
as 1:2020cv00753
Defendant:
Officer Baker, Sgt. Outland and Colonel Meletis
Plaintiff:
Derwin Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipscomb v. Hansen et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Mr. Hansen, R. Osborne, Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welty, Jr. v. Meletis et al
as 3:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jerry Welty, Jr.
Defendant:
Pete Meletis and Glendell Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welty v. Meletis et al
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jerry Welty, Jr.
Defendant:
Pete Meletis, Amanda Lambert, Roderick Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
as 15-6905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RUHREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police, LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C. and MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.
Ruhren v. Spittal et al
as 1:2015cv00445
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Marcos Spittal, Luther and Meletis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Quincer v. Peter Meleti
as 13-7792
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER QUINCER
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
