Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Epps v. UTMB at Galveston
as 23-40198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Epps
Defendant / Appellee:
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, Unknown Drug Company and others
Webb v. Lenz et al
as 6:2017cv00126
Defendant:
Courtney Chung, Allen George, Dr. Douglas Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Troy L. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden-Johnson v. Erwin et al
as 6:2015cv00225
Defendant:
Major FNU Arwitti, Major FNU Benevides, David Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
A'Drana Gooden-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Jones v. UTMB, et al
as 15-40949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY RAY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, at Michael Unit Medical Department, GARY WRIGHT, MELVIN WRIGHT and others
Jones v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00661
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Jones
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, Gary Wright, Melvin Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tony Jones v. UTMB, et al
as 15-40726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY RAY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, at Michael Unit Medical Department, GARY WRIGHT, MELVIN WRIGHT and others
Covarrubias v. Foxworth et al
as 6:2013cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jaime Covarrubias
Defendant:
Todd Foxworth, Dwayne Dewberry, Larry Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball-Vessell v. Wright et al
as 9:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leon D Ball-Vessell
Defendant:
Melvin Wright, Uttam Sarkar, Mr. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Kandl v. Steven Hurt, et al
as 12-41206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW KANDL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLAYTON, DONNA STEELY and MELVIN WRIGHT
Kandl v. Hurt et al
as 6:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kandl
Defendant:
Steven Hurt, Harold Clayton, Donna Steely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
