Cases 31 - 40 of 595
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Zambaftis v. Menards Home Improvement Company
as 1:2023cv04726
Plaintiff:
Christine Zambaftis
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. and Menards Home Improvement Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tyrone v. Menard Inc
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
George Tyrone, Jr
Defendant:
Menard Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rodriguez v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04235
Plaintiff:
George Rodriguez
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Readerlink Distribution Services, LLC v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03881
Plaintiff:
Readerlink Distribution Services, LLC
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McCarter v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03280
Plaintiff:
Brandon McCarter
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc. v. MENARD, INC.,
as 1:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hopp, Raymond v. MJC America, Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hopp
Defendant:
MJC America, Ltd., Gree USA, Inc., Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliance Sales, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
