Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Sabet v. 3M, et al
as 1:2015cv00097
Plaintiff: Sabet and Sam Arthur Sabet
Defendant: 3M, First Union Bank, ABB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06063
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05999
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07489
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TUBBS v. MERCK & CO. INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv05992
Plaintiff: CORNELL TUBBS
Defendant: MERCK & CO. INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Merck, Sharp & Dohne Corp. v. Jack Conway
as 13-5881
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: MERCK, SHARP & DOHNE CORPORATION, fka Merck & Co., Inc.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Jack Conway
as 13-5792
Plaintiff - Appellant: MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, fka Merck & Co., Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02970
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?