Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dames et al v. Mercy Health et al
as 4:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
Kim Dames, David Armstrong and Myra Davis
Defendant:
Mercy Health and Mercy Hospitals East Communities - d/b/a Mercy Hospital Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Raleigh v. deGrange et al
as 4:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Raleigh
Defendant:
Donald A deGrange and Mercy Hospitals East Communities doing business as Mercy Hospital St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raleigh v. degrange et al
as 4:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
James Raleigh
Defendant:
donald degrange and Mercy Hospitals East Communities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cynthia Hoops v. Med. Reimbursements of America, et al
as 19-1251
Defendant / Appellee:
Mercy Hospitals East Communities and Medical Reimbursements of America, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cynthia Hoops
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Hoops v. Medical Reimbursements of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01543
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hoops
Defendant:
Medical Reimbursements of America, Inc. and Mercy Hospitals East Communities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercy Hospitals East Communities v. Aetna Better Health of Missouri LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00883
Plaintiff:
Mercy Hospitals East Communities
Defendant:
Aetna Better Health of Missouri LLC and Aetna Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
