Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KAMBO v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv02896
Plaintiff:
NASIR L. KAMBO
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZENGIN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv02196
Plaintiff:
E.B. ZENGIN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ZENGIN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv02196
Plaintiff:
E.B. ZENGIN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
UUTEGENOV et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
ELLISE ORIEL UUTEGENOV and ALI SERIKOVICH UUTEGENOV
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
