Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Wagner v. Garland
as 8:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Brendan Paul Wagner
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
POLLOCK v. GARLAND
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DANIC POLLOCK
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hoops Corporation et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv20882
Plaintiff:
Hoops Corporation and Angela Di Porzio
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
ASUAJE v. MAYORKAS et al
as 9:2024cv80230
Plaintiff:
Guillermo J ASUAJE
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, DISTRICT DIRECTOR BRETT K RINEHART and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Francois v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv20669
Plaintiff:
Sonel Francois
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
